W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > February 2008

Criteria to evaluate essential things

From: WCAG 2.0 Comment Form <nobody@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 13:30:14 +0000 (GMT)
To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Message-Id: <20080201133014.4BB8DC6DB0@barney.w3.org>

Name: Carlos Iglesias
Email: carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org
Affiliation: FundaciĆ³n CTIC
Document: W2
Item Number: Success Criterion 1.4.9
Part of Item: 
Comment Type: technical
Summary of Issue: Criteria to evaluate essential things
Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change):
The criteria to decide whether something is essential is really ambiguous (specially when you are dealing width graphic designers ;o).

For example, could the use of an image for the presentation of text using some \"non-standard\" font on headers to follow the \"look & feel\" of a specific brand be considered essential for the information conveyed?


(Note that if you say no you are saying that the look & feel of a brand doesn\'t convey any information)

Proposed Change:
Received on Friday, 1 February 2008 13:30:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:10 UTC