W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > August 2008

Re: words in Glossary

From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:46:51 -0700
Message-ID: <824e742c0808291346m4bbfde9fic7955eae29d5a318@mail.gmail.com>
To: makoto.ueki@gmail.com
Cc: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org

>
>
> Name: Makoto Ueki
> Email: makoto.ueki@gmail.com
> Affiliation: JIS Working Group
> Document: W2
> Item Number: (none selected)
> Part of Item:
> Comment Type: general comment
> Summary of Issue: words in Glossary
> Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change):
> We found that several words don't have links to the same words in Glossary though they are defined in Glossary. For the same word, some are linked and the others are not linked. Is this an editorial mistakes? Or the words which don't link to Glossary are used in different meaning?
>
> Proposed Change:
> Add link to Glosarry to all if they are editorial mistakes.
>
>
================================
Response from the Working Group
================================
We provide links from terms as they are used normatively in SC and
some other places. We don't duplicate a link in the SC or
paragraph/section. We only make it a link the first time it appears.

Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair
Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair
Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact


On behalf of the WCAG Working Group
Received on Friday, 29 August 2008 20:47:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 17 July 2011 06:13:26 GMT