Re: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Public Working Draft of May, 2007

That's exactly as I suggested - so yes, I'm happy with the change.

thanks & regards,
Andy

On 04/11/2007, Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Andy Webb,
>
> Thank you for your comments on the 17 May 2007 Public Working Draft of
> the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (WCAG 2.0
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-WCAG20-20070517/). The WCAG Working Group
> has reviewed all comments received on the May draft, and will be
> publishing an updated Public Working Draft shortly. Before we do that,
> we would like to know whether we have understood your comments
> correctly, and also whether you are satisfied with our resolutions.
>
> Please review our resolutions for the following comments, and reply to
> us by 19 November 2007 at public-comments-wcag20@w3.org to say whether
> you are satisfied. Note that this list is publicly archived. Note also
> that we are not asking for new issues, nor for an updated review of
> the entire document at this time.
>
> Please see below for the text of comments that you submitted and our
> resolutions to your comments. Each comment includes a link to the
> archived copy of your original comment on
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/, and may
> also include links to the relevant changes in the WCAG 2.0 Editor's
> Draft of May-October 2007 at
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/WD-WCAG20-20071102/
>
> Thank you for your time reviewing and sending comments. Though we
> cannot always do exactly what each commenter requests, all of the
> comments are valuable to the development of WCAG 2.0.
>
> Regards,
>
> Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair
> Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair
> Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact
>
> On behalf of the WCAG Working Group
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Comment 1: The word "England" is used where a more appropriate term
> would be "the UK"
> Source:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2007May/0130.html
> (Issue ID: 1932)
> ----------------------------
> Original Comment:
> ----------------------------
>
> re:
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20-20070517/Overview.html#seizure-does-not-violate
>
> The word "England" is used where a more appropriate term would be "the
> UK".
> (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Isles_%28terminology%29)
>
> i.e. "This success criterion is based on existing specifications in use in
> England and by others for television broadcast..." should be changed to
> "This success criterion is based on existing specifications in use in the
> UK
> and by others for television broadcast..."
>
> ---------------------------------------------
> Response from Working Group:
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> We have updated the draft as proposed.
>