W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > July 2007

Re: Comment LC-1097

From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 17:30:02 -0700
Message-ID: <824e742c0707061730q35aeb46cu11dc6c51a0db7f33@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Gian Sampson-Wild" <gian@tkh.com.au>
Cc: public-comments-WCAG20@w3.org

The note was added to the Sufficient Techniques Section of
Understanding Success Criterion 2.2.6 (Re-authenticating):
http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20-20070517/#time-limits-server-timeout-110-head

Loretta

On 7/6/07, Gian Sampson-Wild <gian@tkh.com.au> wrote:
> Comment 70:
>
> Source: http://www.w3.org/mid/001f01c695f9$31b504e0$9288b23a@tkhcomputer
> (Issue ID: LC-1097)
>
> Example - A questionnaire with a timeout: In this example, there are several
> recommendations that certainly would make the questionnaire more accessible
> (alert popups, information on timeout etc) but these do not actually relate
> to this (or any) SC. These are excellent requirements - they should be
> developed into SC
>
> Proposed Change:
>
> Create new SC (I am happy to help with this)
>
> ----------------------------
> Response from Working Group:
> ----------------------------
>
> This example illustrates the use of techniques for both 2.2.6 and 2.2.1. To
> make this clear, we have added a note that reads, "Refer to [Techniques for
> Addressing Success Criterion 2.2.1] for techniques related to providing
> notifications about time-outs." to the listing of sufficient techniques in
> 2.2.6.
> ----------------------------
> Response from GSW:
> ----------------------------
> I'm sorry I can't find this reference. Could you please clarify where
> exactly you have added text?
>
>
Received on Saturday, 7 July 2007 00:30:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 17 October 2017 07:46:01 UTC