W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > July 2007

RE: Comment LC-1129

From: Gian Sampson-Wild <gian@tkh.com.au>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 02:16:41 +1000
To: "'Loretta Guarino Reid'" <lorettaguarino@google.com>
Cc: <public-comments-WCAG20@w3.org>
Message-ID: <007f01c7bfe9$0c3ce0f0$b300a8c0@tkhcomputer>

Then perhaps this should be in the "key terms" section? I am concerned that
people will skip over the "intent" section and miss the important definition
information provided by these examples.

-----Original Message-----
From: Loretta Guarino Reid [mailto:lorettaguarino@google.com] 
Sent: Saturday, 7 July 2007 12:20 AM
To: Gian Sampson-Wild
Cc: public-comments-WCAG20@w3.org
Subject: Re: Comment LC-1129

This comment referred to "SC 3.2.1:  When any component receives
focus, it does not cause a change of context."

Loretta

On 7/6/07, Gian Sampson-Wild <gian@tkh.com.au> wrote:
> Comment 102:
>
> Source: http://www.w3.org/mid/001f01c695f9$31b504e0$9288b23a@tkhcomputer
> (Issue ID: LC-1129)
>
> There are examples in the Intent section
>
> Proposed Change:
>
> All examples should be in the Examples or Failures section
>
> ----------------------------
> Response from Working Group:
> ----------------------------
>
> The examples in this item are not examples of the success criterion or
> meeting the success criterion but rather examples of what we mean by one
of
> the terms in the success criterion.  So these particular examples can't go
> in the examples section.
> ----------------------------
> Response from GSW:
> ----------------------------
> Can you please remind me which SC this referred to?
>
>
Received on Friday, 6 July 2007 16:16:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 17 October 2017 07:46:01 UTC