W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > July 2007

Comment LC-1046

From: Gian Sampson-Wild <gian@tkh.com.au>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 02:05:22 +1000
To: "'Loretta Guarino Reid'" <lorettaguarino@google.com>
Cc: <public-comments-WCAG20@w3.org>
Message-ID: <007601c7bfe7$789c5390$b300a8c0@tkhcomputer>

----------------------------------------------------------
Comment 26:

Source: http://www.w3.org/mid/000901c69538$2e394450$f4c9b23a@tkhcomputer
(Issue ID: LC-1046)

2.2.1 & 2.2.3: As previously discussed, further details should be provided
when timeouts is an important part of a real-time event or an activity when
timing is essential.

Proposed Change:

I am happy to write an additional set of criteria (with Loretta)

----------------------------
Response from Working Group:
----------------------------

We have modified the fourth bullet of SC 2.2.1 to be testable by removing
the word "important". And we have moved the auction example from How To Meet
SC 2.2.3 to How To Meet SC 2.2.1.
----------------------------
Response from GSW:
----------------------------
Thank you for addressing my comment
Received on Friday, 6 July 2007 16:05:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 17 October 2017 07:46:01 UTC