W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > July 2007

Comment LC-1060

From: Gian Sampson-Wild <gian@tkh.com.au>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 01:35:18 +1000
To: "'Loretta Guarino Reid'" <lorettaguarino@google.com>
Cc: <public-comments-WCAG20@w3.org>
Message-ID: <006801c7bfe3$45262e40$b300a8c0@tkhcomputer>

----------------------------------------------------------
Comment 38:

Source: http://www.w3.org/mid/000901c69538$2e394450$f4c9b23a@tkhcomputer
(Issue ID: LC-1060)

3.2.1 & 2.2.5: From my reading, 3.2.1 outlaws changes of context when a
component receives focus, but 2.2 allows changes in content for no reason
(only outlawing at L3)

Proposed Change:

Rewrite SC 3.2.1 and 2.2.5

----------------------------
Response from Working Group:
----------------------------

While it is possible that the result of a time limit expiration may be a
change in context or content, success criterion 2.2.1 and 3.2.1 (both at
level A) work together to ensure that both unexpected changes in context as
the result of a component receving focus (3.2.1) and changes in content
resulting from a time-out (2.2.1) will not occur unexpectedly. While
exceptions to success criterion 2.2.1 for real-time events and activities
where timing is essential exist, guideline 2.2 does not allow changes in
content for no reason.
----------------------------
Response from GSW:
----------------------------
I interpreted this SC differently from the stated intention above so perhaps
the WG should consider clarifying some of the SC to avoid such confusion
Received on Friday, 6 July 2007 15:35:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 17 October 2017 07:46:01 UTC