Comment 51: Source: http://www.w3.org/mid/001f01c695f9$31b504e0$9288b23a@tkhcomputer (Issue ID: LC-1074) Example 3: Why isn't a long description required? Proposed Change: Add to example that a long description is required which gives the same information as the image ---------------------------- Response from Working Group: ---------------------------- Since the animation is fully explained in text a longdesc would be redundant and end up having the user who is blind listening to the description twice. So the alternate text provides a short description and mentions that the animation is described in the text that follows it. ---------------------------- Response from GSW: ---------------------------- Can you please tell me which SC this refers to?Received on Friday, 6 July 2007 15:03:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:49 GMT