W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > July 2007

Comment LC-1093

From: Gian Sampson-Wild <gian@tkh.com.au>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 00:29:01 +1000
To: "'Loretta Guarino Reid'" <lorettaguarino@google.com>
Cc: <public-comments-WCAG20@w3.org>
Message-ID: <004101c7bfda$0239d9f0$b300a8c0@tkhcomputer>

Comment 67:

Source: http://www.w3.org/mid/001f01c695f9$31b504e0$9288b23a@tkhcomputer
(Issue ID: LC-1093)

Example - A stock ticker: Doesn't this example violate 1.1.1? If someone
stops the stock ticker and therefore misses out on some information
shouldn't that information be provided elsewhere?

Proposed Change:

Clarify example

----------------------------
Response from Working Group:
----------------------------

Thank you for pointing this out. It was also pointed out by another reviewer
that the sufficient technique for this success criterion requires paused
content to be restarted from the point where it was stopped but with a
notice that the display is delayed. This example has been modified to say
the ticker will restart from the point where it was paused so that all
trades that occurred while it was paused will be displayed.

However, if a control to turn off (rather than pause) the presention of
real-time information via non-text content (ex. an applet) were present,
there would be no requirement that the information that was not displayed
during the time it was turned off would be available.
----------------------------
Response from GSW:
----------------------------
Thank you for addressing my comment
Received on Friday, 6 July 2007 14:29:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 17 October 2017 07:46:01 UTC