W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > December 2007

Re: reply to the review of Issue ID: 2054

From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:30:27 -0800
Message-ID: <824e742c0712111530s41a5f930ua21e3444a1ce6703@mail.gmail.com>
To: "aurélien levy" <aurelien.levy@free.fr>
Cc: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org

Yes. Flash would not be accessibility supported on your platform. The
documented list of Web technologies and their accessibility support
should include information on the platforms that support the
technology.

Regarding testing, the testing should be done on the platforms where
the content is intended to be used. If, for example, content is
intended to be used on Macs and it will not work on Macs, then it
would not conform to WCAG.

Regards,

Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair
Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair
Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact

On behalf of the WCAG Working Group

On Nov 4, 2007 2:56 AM, aurélien levy <aurelien.levy@free.fr> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> here is my comment in regard of the current review for bug 2054 :
> http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=2054
>
> For the Flash example, since the flash plugin doesn't support the osX or
> Linux accessibility API, I can't validate the G10 or the G135 sufficient
> techniques (except the case of close environment with PC) and the test
> procedure for this two sufficient techniques need to mention the fact
> that the test need to be done on different plateform (except the case of
> close environment with PC)
>
> Best regards,
>
> Aurélien Levy
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2007 23:30:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:09 UTC