Name: Dr Philip J Naylor Email: P.J.Naylor@bristol.ac.uk Affiliation: University of Bristol Document: UW Item Number: How to Meet Success Criterion 2.4.8 Part of Item: Intent Comment Type: TE Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change): The difference between sections 2.4.8 and 2.4.4 is subtle and and not well illustrated by just copying the contents of 2.4.4 into 2.4.8 and removing the 2 or 3 sentences that do not apply. Proposed Change: Emphasise more how this differs from 2.4.4 including clearer examples.Received on Monday, 22 May 2006 13:25:01 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 24 March 2009 12:11:55 GMT