W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > April 2006

Re: [STRUCTURE] - alternative wording?

From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 18:50:09 +0200
To: dom@w3.org
Cc: public-bpwg-comments@w3.org, "WCAG 2 comments" <public-comments-wcag20@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.s7301vgrwxe0ny@widsith.sponsor-tribune.tg06.gathering.org>

CC+ WCAG comments, since the same comment applies to their document.

On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 19:05:09 +0200, <dom@w3.org> wrote:

> Your comment on [STRUCTURE] Ensure t...:

> The wording "Ensure that perceivable structures within the content can be
> programatically determined", copied verbatim from the WCAG working draft,
> has proven to be very difficult to understand for the majority of the
> developers I have ased to comment on this draft (which is only a couple  
> of dozen).
> Perhaps something more straightforward, like "use markup, properly" is
> simpler for a title, with the current title moved into the "what it  
> means" session as a couple of sentences.

> Working Group Resolution:
> We have changed the wording to:
> "Use features of the markup language to indicate logical document
> structure."

Thanks, I am happy with this resolution.

cheers

Chaals

-- 
Charles McCathieNevile                     chaals@opera.com
   hablo español  -  je parle français  -  jeg lærer norsk
      Peek into the kitchen: http://snapshot.opera.com/
Received on Sunday, 16 April 2006 16:50:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 17 July 2011 06:13:19 GMT