- From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 14:42:38 -0400
- To: Greg Lowney <gcl-0039@access-research.org>
- Cc: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Hello Greg, Thank you for your comments on WCAG 2.0 [1]. This email shows how the WCAG WG has attempted to address one of your concerns. We will send a separate email for each of the issues you raised. Please let us know if we have adequately addressed your issues. Issue 706 [2] Greg Lowney writes: 63. Guideline 3.4 "the content has been reviewed, taking into account." 63.a. [MEDIUM PRIORITY] Isn't there some way that this criterion could be made to have some impact or benefit? I'm afraid that, as it is, criteria phrased this way will just be a checkbox that can be checked without anyone doing anything! Perhaps, to have some benefit, the web site could post a review of its usability and rationale for their decisions to avoid making improvements. Something? Anything? == This guideline was significantly rewritten in the March 11, 2004 Working Draft [3]. Instead of a list of "ideas to consider" we rewrote the list as testable statements. Do you agree that the latest wording improves the impact of the Guideline? Thank you, --wendy [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2003Nov/0003.html [2] http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=706 [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-WCAG20-20040311/#consistent-behavior -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI/ /--
Received on Monday, 19 April 2004 14:47:14 UTC