W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > April 2004

WCAG 2.0 comments: Issue 706

From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 14:42:38 -0400
Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20040419143915.02162f90@localhost>
To: Greg Lowney <gcl-0039@access-research.org>
Cc: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org

Hello Greg,

Thank you for your comments on WCAG 2.0 [1].  This email shows how the WCAG 
WG has attempted to address one of your concerns.  We will send a separate 
email for each of the issues you raised. Please let us know if we have 
adequately addressed your issues.

Issue 706 [2]

Greg Lowney writes:

63.     Guideline 3.4 "the content has been reviewed, taking into
account."

63.a.    [MEDIUM PRIORITY] Isn't there some way that this criterion
could be made to have some impact or benefit? I'm afraid that, as it is,
criteria phrased this way will just be a checkbox that can be checked
without anyone doing anything! Perhaps, to have some benefit, the web
site could post a review of its usability and rationale for their
decisions to avoid making improvements. Something? Anything?
==

This guideline was significantly rewritten in the March 11, 2004 Working 
Draft [3].  Instead of a list of "ideas to consider" we rewrote the list as 
testable statements.  Do you agree that the latest wording improves the 
impact of the Guideline?

Thank you,
--wendy

[1] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2003Nov/0003.html
[2] http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=706
[3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-WCAG20-20040311/#consistent-behavior

-- wendy a chisholm
world wide web consortium
web accessibility initiative
http://www.w3.org/WAI/
/--  
Received on Monday, 19 April 2004 14:47:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 17 July 2011 06:13:18 GMT