- From: Steve Lee <stevelee@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:00:59 +0100
- To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org
On 13/06/2019 16:31, lisa.seeman wrote: > I suggest we make sure we have the persona for each topic in the > gap-analysis > <https://w3c.github.io/coga/gap-analysis/#roadmap-of-solutions-against-user-needs> and > check the user stories in the gap analysis are covered Definitely! But not necessary 1 to 1 mapping as a persona could cover several gaps if that makes sense. That might leave gaps for requirements that do not appear as gaps. A second check would be to look for requirements that are met with technology but not included in external Personas covering non cognitive "specific" requirements. Steve
Received on Friday, 14 June 2019 09:01:04 UTC