RE: Anything for a possible 2.2?

Hi Lisa and Alastair,



I likely know the most about Accessible Authentication, and am the COGA TF member who worked with the Web Authentication group. Unfortunately, I am unavailable for Thursday’s call. If you want my input, I suggest we:

  *   wait for the 10/25 COGA TF call;
  *   schedule a separate call; or
  *   communicate via email



John

John Rochford<http://bit.ly/profile-rj>
University of Massachusetts Medical School
Eunice Kennedy Shriver Center
Director, INDEX Program
Faculty, Family Medicine & Community Health
www.DisabilityInfo.org
LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/in/john-rochford/>

Confidentiality Notice:
This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary, and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and destroy or permanently delete all copies of the original message.




-----Original Message-----
From: lisa.seeman [mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 1:33 PM
To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Cc: COGA TF <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Anything for a possible 2.2?



The accessible authetification "should" get in as the web authentication specification is now more mature, the main objections should be over. However, will that help with self programming routers and other obscure objections?





Should we discuss this on Thusdays call?





All the best





Lisa Seeman





LinkedIn, Twitter <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_SeemanLisa&d=DwMFaQ&c=WJBj9sUF1mbpVIAf3biu3CPHX4MeRjY_w4DerPlOmhQ&r=CueeOhb9CA5L2yfl16hThwCe1zS5LdHYD5MikPNgKr4&m=XXyVZIQccUu0c9-wHjZ8DafIbTzGSLpKlzqfC91dRjE&s=aX-bxoIfdfZLRSZKHDx9B9J_c4xmaNF5Ddlae8D4i2I&e=>









---- On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 19:37:41 +0300 Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com<mailto:acampbell@nomensa.com>> wrote ----







      Hi Lisa (and COGA),











      Pre-TPAC, it would be useful to know if there are any potential SCs you’d consider for a WCAG 2.2?











      We haven’t determined whether the group will tackle that yet, but part of the decision would be: Is it useful to do a 2.2?











      Looking back, there is quite a lot in the ‘defer’ list here:





https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue+label%3ACOGA+label%3Adefer <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_w3c_wcag21_issues-3Futf8-3D-25E2-259C-2593-26q-3Dis-253Aissue-2Blabel-253ACOGA-2Blabel-253Adefer&d=DwMFaQ&c=WJBj9sUF1mbpVIAf3biu3CPHX4MeRjY_w4DerPlOmhQ&r=CueeOhb9CA5L2yfl16hThwCe1zS5LdHYD5MikPNgKr4&m=XXyVZIQccUu0c9-wHjZ8DafIbTzGSLpKlzqfC91dRjE&s=TTU1LiuzaOlY59S86SKOzfPacXQri2ZAwpzsbGr3ofo&e=> +











      I assume most of those have been integrated into the design-requirements doc.











      The one that comes to mind for me is the Authentication SC, not requiring passwords. With Webauth standardised now, one of the main arguments has changed.





https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/23 <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_w3c_wcag21_issues_23&d=DwMFaQ&c=WJBj9sUF1mbpVIAf3biu3CPHX4MeRjY_w4DerPlOmhQ&r=CueeOhb9CA5L2yfl16hThwCe1zS5LdHYD5MikPNgKr4&m=XXyVZIQccUu0c9-wHjZ8DafIbTzGSLpKlzqfC91dRjE&s=J-R7p3JouS66yYMguz-1uL-U94hEtIjqw_ZN2JczEOU&e=>











      Are there any others that were reasonably close, but didn’t make it in?











      If not, that would be a factor in putting more effort into Silver rather than a 2.2, but I just wanted to check.











      Kind regards,











      -Alastair

















      Kind regards,











      -Alastair











      --











      www.nomensa.com<http://www.nomensa.com> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.nomensa.com_&d=DwMFaQ&c=WJBj9sUF1mbpVIAf3biu3CPHX4MeRjY_w4DerPlOmhQ&r=CueeOhb9CA5L2yfl16hThwCe1zS5LdHYD5MikPNgKr4&m=XXyVZIQccUu0c9-wHjZ8DafIbTzGSLpKlzqfC91dRjE&s=nUR0HjSCBV22YZeWGvzuawUqouDCBWsgiWZUiaVCsBA&e=>

      tel: +44 (0)117 929 7333 / 07970 879 653

      follow us: @we_are_nomensa or me: @alastc

      Nomensa Ltd. King William House, 13 Queen Square, Bristol BS1 4NT









      Company number: 4214477 | UK VAT registration: GB 771727411