- From: Steve Lee <steve@opendirective.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 10:44:11 +0100
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Cc: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Looks like I still have commit access, but will make a Pull Request (PR) anyway as a good workflow and in case there are any comments. However I am concerned a GitHub PR with embedded comments will not be easily accessible for everyone here so will restrict to symbols editorial changes as you suggest. Steve Lee OpenDirective http://opendirective.com On 30 August 2018 at 09:29, Steve Lee <steve@opendirective.com> wrote: > Thanks Alastair, that's great. > > Steve Lee > Sent from my mobile device Please excuse typing errors > > On Thu, 30 Aug 2018, 08:58 Alastair Campbell, <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Steve, >> >> That would be great, the latest version is here: >> https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/gap-analysis/index.html >> >> I think the only difference with the editors draft is that Appendix A has >> been moved out of the doc. >> >> Making a branch from here: https://github.com/w3c/coga/ (e.g. stevelee-qa) >> would be great. >> >> To make it easier for others to review, I previously added a class of >> 'update' to any element I changed, and put a bit of CSS in the head to >> highlight it with a yellow background. (That's removed before merging.) >> >> For QA/typos and adding missing sections that is a good process. For >> things that are more than QA, e.g. moving or removing things, I suggest >> posting the suggestion here first. >> >> Kind regards, >> >> -Alastair >> >> >> On 29/08/2018, 13:16, "Steve Lee" <steve@opendirective.com> wrote: >> >> In reading the published Roadmap and gap analysis I spotted a few >> type-os >> >> How do you want them submitted? >> >> My natural inclination is to provide a PR with changes to >> https://github.com/w3c/coga/blob/master/gap-analysis/index.html >> but I doubt that is the correct process, especially as the source is >> not mention in the published doc. >> >> Plus I was reading the >> https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/WD-coga-gap-analysis-20180607/ and not the >> editors draft. >> >> How should more detailed comments be passed on - via this list? >> >> Thanks >> >> Steve Lee >> OpenDirective http://opendirective.com >> >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 30 August 2018 09:44:35 UTC