Re: implementions needed

Hi Chris and John

I think it is most useful if you work with the vocabulary at https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/blob/master/semantics.html


Let us know if you have any issues.


All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn, Twitter





---- On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 20:13:06 +0300 John Foliot<john.foliot@deque.com> wrote ---- 

Hi Lisa,


I am working on examples for both as time allows (hopefully something to show at TPAC). I have also asked Chris McMeeking (one of our crackerjack engineers here at Deque) to help with a browser extension "thingy" that will serve to at least illustrate both intent as well as viability. 


Longer-term, because we are dependant on metadata pretty much for both of these SC, we'll need to see real tools do something with that metadata, above and beyond exposing the values on-screen (your JSON example for COGA semantics being the kind of thing needed - i.e. "transformations", rather than just 'exposing' - right?)


JF


On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:17 AM, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote:
Hi Folks (and EA specifically)

We need implementations of  our success criteria if they are going to stay in WCAG


specifically we need four web pages that use the techniques for purpose of controls (http://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/master/guidelines/index.html#purpose-of-controls) - Probably each item listed under the conventional name of  conventional buttons or controls, or conventional links put into the code of a web page (we can find places that are using conventional form fields already)


we also need one implemention fro each item for the meta data SC (see http://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/master/guidelines/index.html#contextual-information )




Can anyone do one?

All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn, Twitter











-- 
John Foliot


Principal Accessibility Strategist

Deque Systems Inc.

john.foliot@deque.com



Advancing the mission of digital accessibility and inclusion