W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org > March 2017

Re: wcag 2.1 for people with learning disabilities

From: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 18:52:08 +0200
To: McSorley <jan.mcsorley@pearson.com>
Cc: "public-cognitive-a11y-tf" <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Message-Id: <15ad2e06611.ff0d053a171826.5621580529556530733@zoho.com>
I needed to talk it over a bit with the WCAG chairs anyway, so I needed to do it anyway :)
All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn, Twitter

---- On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:57:38 +0200  McSorley&lt;jan.mcsorley@pearson.com&gt; wrote ---- 

Hi Lisa,

Thanks for getting this started.  This is on my agenda for tomorrow.  The format looks good to me.  I will do a more thorough read of what you have done so far and will work on adding the rest.  Again - thanks for getting it started. This gives me a better idea of what you were hoping to get.

   Jan McSorley
  VP, Accessibility
Psychometrics and Testing Services
  400 Center Ridge Drive, Suite E
Austin, TX  78753
  M - (512) 673-9569
  Twitter: @Jan_McSorley
Skype:  jan.mcsorley
  Learn more at pearson.com  

We put a man on the moon in the 1960's ... surely we can make information technology fully accessible to people with disabilities.  It can be done ... it must be done ... it will be done!

On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 2:02 PM, lisa.seeman &lt;lisa.seeman@zoho.com&gt; wrote:
Hi folks

We got some feedback that most of our users can not review wcag 2.1 - it is too hard.

We are putting together a draft for coga groups to review. See https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NBjIZgCRNRXbdC1xtrYu9vMwgEEpGDSLDZ_5IcpN0zw/edit?usp=sharing

I did the first three and wrote an introduction. 
Is the format OK?

Jan, Jim etc -  can you add the rest?

All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn, Twitter

Received on Wednesday, 15 March 2017 16:52:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 15 March 2017 16:52:39 UTC