W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org > June 2017

Proposed wording for support personlization

From: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 15:21:30 +0300
To: "public-cognitive-a11y-tf" <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Message-Id: <15cca99b878.b5e954824753.3003908218561297681@zoho.com>
Hi folks

We need wording for personlization support. It will be better if we have wording that does not require adding semantics as that will be considored a burden and will get a lot of  resistance.  However we want to encourage it.


Do you like...


"
For pages   that contains  interactive controls or non essential content  one of the following is true:


- there is a mechanism is available for personlization of content that removes non essential functionality and content,  and enables the user to add symbols to interactive controls for essential functionality or


- contextual information can be programaticaly determined for essential functionality and content and essential functionality and content can be programaticaly identified.


"


we define Essential functionality and content as - the minimum functionality and content that is essential to identify the topic and fulfill the purpose of the content



All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn, Twitter
Received on Wednesday, 21 June 2017 12:22:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 21 June 2017 12:22:04 UTC