- From: EA Draffan <ead@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 10:23:05 +0000
- To: "lisa. seeman (lisa.seeman@zoho.com)" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
- CC: John Rochford <john.rochford@umassmed.edu>, public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Could the second version mean someone is only accepting the idea of the SC and not contents? Then they may wish to change the idea of the SC when they talk about “ with the following changes"? The first option seems to remove any doubt. Best wishes E.A. On 31 Jan 2017, at 09:23, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com<mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com>> wrote: No idea... All the best Lisa Seeman LinkedIn<http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter<https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa> ---- On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 18:45:32 +0200 Rochford<john.rochford@umassmed.edu<mailto:john.rochford@umassmed.edu>> wrote ---- Lisa, The SC proposals say either: * Accept this SC * Accept this SC with the following changes OR * Accept this SC in concept * Accept this SC in concept with the following changes Why the difference? John John Rochford<http://bit.ly/profile-rj> UMass Medical School/E.K. Shriver Center Director, INDEX Program Instructor, Family Medicine & Community Health www.DisabilityInfo.org<http://www.disabilityinfo.org/> Twitter: @ClearHelper<https://twitter.com/clearhelper> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary, and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and destroy or permanently delete all copies of the original message. From: lisa.seeman [mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com<mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com>] Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 11:31 AM To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org<mailto:public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>> Subject: wcag survay on two of our SC's Hi folks We have survey to accept two of our SC<https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/SC_review_Jan2017/?> and some good low vision SC's Please fill it in if you can. https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/SC_review_Jan2017/? All the best Lisa Seeman LinkedIn<http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter<https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
Received on Tuesday, 31 January 2017 10:23:42 UTC