W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org > August 2017

Re: Re: CFC - Purpose of Controls SC

From: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 23:59:52 +0300
To: "public-cognitive-a11y-tf" <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Message-Id: <15de7b20f2d.1208d2cde209788.5245096215866407529@zoho.com>
Hi Folks

The Purpose of Controls SC  is going back to a call for consensus on the wcag list!

All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn, Twitter





---- On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:22:05 +0300 lisa.seeman&lt;lisa.seeman@zoho.com&gt; wrote ---- 

Yes, I agree it might get a second chance.But the task force should be aware that if they want these criteria to get though it will be ready helpful if people also respond to the call for consensus (CFC)

All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn, Twitter





---- On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:04:42 +0300 Alastair Campbell&lt;acampbell@nomensa.com&gt; wrote ---- 

      Hi Lisa,
  
 I’d be careful calling it a vote, it doesn’t depend on what the percentages are, it depends on what the objections are.
  
 Having lots of positive votes is useful, but doesn’t mean it passes.
  
 I also wouldn’t call it lost yet, but there are objections to overcome.
  
 -Alastair
  
  
  
  From: "lisa.seeman" 
  
 
  as not enoguh people voted for the call for consensus on the wcag list we now lost this sc 
 
   
 
  
 
 
Received on Tuesday, 15 August 2017 21:00:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 15 August 2017 21:00:21 UTC