W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org > November 2016

Re: Change to Identify Charges. Please re

From: Thaddeus . <inclusivethinking@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 15:51:54 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOh2y+9DE=7u_XPpfrg1xM5TW_A6_azTJ6hqKG_dUx312YJZ8g@mail.gmail.com>
To: EA Draffan <ead@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Cc: "lisa. seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>, public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Hi EA,

Thanks for the query. I was suggesting "associated conditions ..." as
opposed to "associated charges". A large ecommerce Website for example will
at any given time have a various terms and conditions in different places
for various reasons. A sale, a return policy, a contest, etc.  I was
suggesting "associated conditions ..." to clarify that the SC is referring
to conditions and terms that only impact the transaction task. Just a
suggestion. I don't have a strong objection to the new wording as is as the
association is implied.

Best
Thaddeus
On Nov 19, 2016 2:35 PM, "EA Draffan" <ead@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:

> +1 but I am wondering if we use associated would they ask what do
> associated charges encompass?
>
> Best wishes
> E.A.
> Sent from my mobile phone
>
> On 19 Nov 2016, at 17:59, Thaddeus . <inclusivethinking@gmail.com<mailto:
> inclusivethinking@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
> +1 - I am wondering if the word "associated" may be useful. "Associated
> conditions and term ..."
>
> Best,
> Thaddeus
>
> On Nov 19, 2016 8:28 AM, "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com<mailto:l
> isa.seeman@zoho.com>> wrote:
> Based on Mike's comments I would like to suggest the following change
>
> Old wording:
> Identify Charges: All types of charges and conditions are identified at
> the start of transaction tasks. When a minimum or typical value is known
> for a type of charge it must be be made clear at the start of the
> transaction task.
>
> New wording:
> Identify Charges: All types of charges  are identified at the start of
> transaction tasks. When a minimum or typical value is known for a type of
> charge it must be be made clear at the start of the transaction task.
> Conditions and terms are available at the start of transaction tasks.
>
> Please raise any objection in the next 48 hours
>
>
> Note: this would  allow terms to be under a link but charges to be clearly
> displayed. T
>
> All the best
>
> Lisa Seeman
>
> LinkedIn<http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter<
> https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
>
>
>
Received on Saturday, 19 November 2016 23:53:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Saturday, 19 November 2016 23:53:32 UTC