W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org > November 2016

Re: Change to Identify Charges. Please re

From: Thaddeus . <inclusivethinking@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 09:55:42 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOh2y+9gnRn1-e-gZAfhXptSqScCA_eRVPE8NRPeZZaS8LFUVQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "lisa. seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
Cc: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
+1 - I am wondering if the word "associated" may be useful. "Associated
conditions and term ..."

Best,
Thaddeus
On Nov 19, 2016 8:28 AM, "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote:

> Based on Mike's comments I would like to suggest the following change
>
> Old wording:
> Identify Charges: All types of charges and conditions are identified at
> the start of transaction tasks. When a minimum or typical value is known
> for a type of charge it must be be made clear at the start of the
> transaction task.
>
> New wording:
> Identify Charges: All types of charges  are identified at the start of
> transaction tasks. When a minimum or typical value is known for a type of
> charge it must be be made clear at the start of the transaction task.
> Conditions and terms are available at the start of transaction tasks.
>
> Please raise any objection in the next 48 hours
>
>
> Note: this would  allow terms to be under a link but charges to be clearly
> displayed. T
>
> All the best
>
> Lisa Seeman
>
> LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
>
>
>
Received on Saturday, 19 November 2016 17:59:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Saturday, 19 November 2016 17:59:13 UTC