Re: CFC - call for consensus (48 hours)

+1 Sorry for the late response. It is is a lengthy document

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 10:38 AM, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote:

> Hi Folks
>
> A while ago we agreed to publish the gap analyses. See
> https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/gap-analysis/
>
> The publication process took a long time and has not been completed.  In
> the meantime we have improved a lot of the material such as the tables of
> user needs (see tables
> <https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/gap-analysis/table.html>). The
> proposal for semantics has also been improved to meet these needs.
>
> The proposal is to replace the old content for the publication with the
> new and improved content. Please respond within 48 hours with any
> objections or comments. silence will be taken as agreement.
>
> Note that replacing the tables was  passed already on the call.
> All the best
>
> Lisa Seeman
>
> LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
>
>
>