RE: volunteer for success criteria

I have put my name beside
"Provide a clear and understandable layout"

Best wishes
E.A.

Mrs E.A. Draffan
WAIS, ECS , University of Southampton
Mobile +44 (0)7976 289103
http://access.ecs.soton.ac.uk<http://access.ecs.soton.ac.uk/>
UK AAATE rep http://www.aaate.net/

http://www.emptech.info<http://www.emptech.info/>

From: lisa.seeman [mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com]
Sent: 12 August 2016 06:40
To: inclusivethinking <inclusivethinking@gmail.com>
Cc: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Subject: Re: volenteer for success cryteria

Thanks! Did you see the new proposal? It has been broken up into two criteria. Is that still ok?
All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn<http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter<https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>


---- On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 04:33:46 +0300 Thad C<inclusivethinking@gmail.com<mailto:inclusivethinking@gmail.com>> wrote ----


I will sign up for:

Support is provided that help users complete and check their task, that includes: Note - will be broken up

I will log into the system to official take onto the task in a bit.

Thaddeus
On Aug 11, 2016 7:34 AM, "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com<mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com>> wrote:

Hi Folks

Please can you volunteer for putting success criteria into the WCAG template by signing up here:
https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/SC_todo_list


Writing up according to the template: https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/wiki/Proposals-for-new-Success-Criteria


(also attached as html page - if you need it in MS word let me know)

I made a sample at : https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/extension/support-personalization.html (note this does not follow the template right now but has all the content - I will try to update it to the new template soon)

It is worth looking at wcag 2.O such as https://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/text-equiv-all.html to see the kind of wording used in WCAG.

Comply with: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/WCAG_2.1_Success_Criteria


Also, realy realy important , is we want to get these passed, to do this we realy want to:


  *   show the benefits including any evidence and
  *   show test-ability
  *   make it clear
you can see an example of a general test procedure here: https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20160317/G92.html#G92-tests


Some thing we might want to clarify s that people with cognitive disabilities include many types of disabilities such as
people with

  *   Language related disabilities
  *   Memory related disabilities
  *   Focus and attention related disabilities
  *   Executive and decision making disabilities



All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn<http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter<https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>