W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org > October 2015

Re: Two important drafts to review.

From: Debra Ruh Global <debra@ruhglobal.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 09:49:27 +0300
Cc: Steve Lee <steve@opendirective.com>, Jamie Knight <Jamie.Knight@bbc.co.uk>, public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>, "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>, "Rochford, John" <john.rochford@umassmed.edu>
Message-Id: <7D52B139-C885-4D8A-9029-B6AA77144E70@ruhglobal.com>
To: EA Draffan <ead@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
+1 also 

Debra Ruh, Ruh Global CEO & AXSChat Co-Founder
Global Accessibility & Disability Inclusion Strategist 
G3ict Employability Chair
(804) 986-4500 
Debra@RuhGlobal.com
www.RuhGlobal.com

Follow Me on twitter,linked-in, facebook,pinterest, tumblr, Google+
& SKYPE at debraruh 

"Uncovering Hidden Human Capital: How Leading Corporations Leverage Multiple Abilities in Their Workforce" will be published by G3ict on December 2, 2015 

"Find Your Voice using Social Media" by Debra Ruh http://ow.ly/kxglR







> On Oct 9, 2015, at 5:08 PM, EA Draffan <ead@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> I also agree. There are ARASAAC and SCLERA as Creative Commons symbol sets but very different in style and linguistic elements.
> 
> Best wishes
> E.A.
> Sent from my mobile phone
> 
> On 9 Oct 2015, at 13:56, Steve Lee <steve@opendirective.com<mailto:steve@opendirective.com>> wrote:
> 
> 
> +1
> 
> Though Garry has passed straight-street pending much needed resources.
> 
> Steve Lee
> Sent from my mobile device Please excuse typing errors
> 
> On 9 Oct 2015 12:33, "Jamie Knight" <Jamie.Knight@bbc.co.uk<mailto:Jamie.Knight@bbc.co.uk>> wrote:
> Helo,
> 
> +1 to:
> 
> "I don't agree with the following. I don't think any recommendation will be widely / sufficiently adopted if it requires people with disabilities to purchase something."
> 
> IMHO We should work in the open via things like Straight Street and the noun project.
> 
> Jamie + Lion
> _______________________________________
> From: Rochford, John [john.rochford@umassmed.edu<mailto:john.rochford@umassmed.edu>]
> Sent: 09 October 2015 12:14
> To: lisa.seeman; public-cognitive-a11y-tf
> Subject: RE: Two important drafts to review.
> 
> Hi Lisa and All,
> 
> 
> 
> There's a lot to like about the drafts. I think the explanations and the examples are good. Grammar issues will have to be resolved in the final version.
> 
> 
> 
> I think we should be sure what we are proposing cannot be accomplished within ARIA's current capabilities. I believe this is in line w/ Rich's previous comments.
> 
> 
> 
> I wonder if our proposal will be obviated by GPII, as Steve may be suggesting.
> 
> 
> 
> I don't agree with the following. I don't think any recommendation will be widely / sufficiently adopted if it requires people with disabilities to purchase something.
> 
> 
> 
> "That means the end use (sic) could buy the symbols and use them across different devices or applications."
> 
> John
> 
> John Rochford<http://profiles.umassmed.edu/profiles/display/132901>
> UMass Medical School/E.K. Shriver Center
> Director, INDEX Program
> Instructor, Family Medicine & Community Health
> www.DisabilityInfo.org<http://www.DisabilityInfo.org>
> Twitter: @ClearHelper<https://twitter.com/clearhelper>
> [Facebook Button]<http://www.facebook.com/pages/New-England-INDEXShriver-CenterUMass-Medical-School/227064920160>[Twitter Button]<https://twitter.com/NEINDEX> [WordPress Logo] <http://www.disabilityinfo.org/blog/>
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lisa.seeman [mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com<mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com>]
> Sent: Saturday, October 03, 2015 9:27 PM
> To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org<mailto:public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>>
> Subject: Two important drafts to review.
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Folks
> 
> 
> 
> I pulled together the conclusions for this weeks call, and the other emails going back and forth, to make a new version of the adaptable links and buttons issue paper. I think it is now ready to be a proposal for WAI-ARIA extension for COGA.
> 
> Please take a look and tell me what else it needs to be submitted as a first draft for ARIA to look at.
> 
> see : https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/issue-papers/links-buttons.html
> 
> 
> 
> When we have it all together it is easier to  see if there are  issues. So please review it carefully.
> 
> 
> 
> I also pulled out of the draft of the gap analysis the content that is relevant for a WCAG extension. See https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/Proposal_for_WCAG
> 
> I think we should review it and then ask WCAG if this is in the right direction.
> 
> 
> 
> Taking these two pieces out of the gap analysis may allow us more time to work on the other issue papers without delaying the dependent deadlines for WCAG or ARIA.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> All the best
> 
> 
> 
> Lisa Seeman
> 
> 
> 
> Athena ICT Accessibility Projects <http://accessibility.athena-ict.com>
> 
> LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/> , Twitter <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Saturday, 10 October 2015 06:50:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Saturday, 10 October 2015 06:50:08 UTC