Re: notation for access keys

Lisa, I think we should be consistent. So my vote would be yes. Thanks for your leadership. Debra

Debra Ruh, Ruh Global Communications & AXSChat 
Global Accessibility and Disability Inclusion Strategist 
G3ict Employability & Technology Chair
(804) 986-4500 
Debra@RuhGlobal.com
www.RuhGlobal.com

Follow Me on twitter,linked-in, facebook,pinterest, tumblr, Google+
And SKYPE at debraruh 

Proud to announce my book “Find Your Voice using Social Media” http://ow.ly/kxglR

My 2nd book "Uncovering Hidden Human Capital: How Leading Corporations Leverage Multiple Abilities in Their Workforce" will be published in 2015.








> On Jul 30, 2015, at 4:52 AM, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Folks 
> Should  our default representation for keyboard short cuts be consistent with the following
> 
> http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/aria/aria.html#aria-kbdshortcuts 
> 
> (This is for the personalization notation in 
> 
> see https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/issue-papers/links-buttons.html
> and  https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/cognitive-a11y-tf/wiki/Easy_Personalization
> 
> )
> 
> All the best
> 
> Lisa Seeman
> 
> Athena ICT Accessibility Projects 
> LinkedIn, Twitter
> 
>