W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-cdf@w3.org > January 2008

Re: xml:id

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 18:31:15 -0500
Message-ID: <e9dffd640801031531n77793e88xd67f4466b776264f@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: "Timur Mehrvarz" <timur.mehrvarz@web.de>, public-cdf@w3.org, "Eric Seidel" <eric@webkit.org>

On 1/3/08, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 20:35:21 +0100, Timur Mehrvarz <timur.mehrvarz@web.de>
> wrote:
> > I'm forwarding this message I received from Eric Seidel a few days back.
> > Their decision makes me a uncomfortable. People can use xml:id in their
> > XHTML+SVG content and be compliant with one browser, currently. Or they
> > can use id without xml: and be compliant with 3 browsers. But not with
> > the SVG Tiny 1.2 spec. Or am I missing something?
>
> I very much concur with the WebKit team that SVG should not replace id="",
> which already works, with xml:id="". (Despite the fact that we implemented
> xml:id support of some sorts.)

+1

Mark.
-- 
Mark Baker.  Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.         http://www.markbaker.ca
Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies  http://www.coactus.com
Received on Thursday, 3 January 2008 23:31:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:42 GMT