Jirka Kosek wrote: > Henri Sivonen wrote: > >> The above trial balloon proposal is designed to optimize SVG integration >> in text/html in *future* browsers in a way that would create a >> namespace-aware DOM > > Hmm, and why to support SVG (or any other embedded vocabulary) in HTML > serialization at all. XML serialization can be used without any problems > for such purposes. I think that cleaner approach is to switch from HTML > to XML syntax if you want to use XML features. Trying to emulate XML > features in HTML syntax is way to hell. Two reasons: 1) People often author content which is inserted into a larger context. Blogs, wikis, comments, are but a few examples. Requiring the entire page to be xml well formed, and requiring that none of the page be displayed if there is any well formedness errors, is a non-starter for most sites. I'd love to see the day when svg could be copy/pasted into MySpace and MathML copy/pasted into Facebook, and have it "just work". 2) There are is well-known and widely deployed browser which will not display content served as application/xhtml+xml at all. - Sam RubyReceived on Sunday, 14 October 2007 02:03:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:41 GMT