W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-cdf@w3.org > February 2007

Re: comments on WICD Mobile DOM section

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 21:02:32 +0100
To: "Steve K Speicher" <sspeiche@us.ibm.com>
Cc: public-cdf@w3.org, "Vincent Hardy" <Vincent.Hardy@sun.com>
Message-ID: <op.tm40miih64w2qv@id-c0020>

On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 20:57:18 +0100, Steve K Speicher <sspeiche@us.ibm.com>  
wrote:
>>>> I see. The Window Object 1.0 specification already mandates that
>>>> though (section 2.2 in the current draft). So it seems unnecessary.
>
> Though I'd hesitate to assume that Window Object already mandates it, as
> it has only gone through 1 public work draft and not last call.  So I'd
> recommend getting an official response from the WebAPI WG stating that
> this WILL remain before pulling it from our spec.

??

As I pointed out it already does. In section 2.2 of the current Window  
Object 1.0 draft...


>>> If we take out section 3.6.10 from WICD Mobile (the one you are
>>> commenting on), there are no other references to the Window Object 1.0
>>> specification.
>>
>> Suggested wording:
>>
>>    A conformanet WICD Mobile 1.0 user agent must support
>>    the Window Object 1.0 specification. [Window]
>
> This is already said, indirectly, since CDRF requires Window in:
>   http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-CDR-20061122/#dom
>
> Perhaps this conformance statement should be added to CDRF conformance
> section.

I thought Window was already required somewhere else but apparently  
dropping section 3.6.10 was found to be objectionary.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Friday, 2 February 2007 20:03:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:41 GMT