W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-cdf@w3.org > February 2007

Re: comments on WICD Mobile DOM section

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 15:37:45 +0100
To: "Vincent Hardy" <Vincent.Hardy@sun.com>, public-cdf@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.tm4lk7na64w2qv@id-c0020>

On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 02:58:47 +0100, Vincent Hardy <Vincent.Hardy@Sun.COM>  
> What we are saying is:
> "In conformant WICD Mobile 1.0 user agents, the org.w3c.dom.AbstractView  
> associated with an org.w3c.dom.DocumentView (I.E THE defaultView  
> property) must be an implementation of the Window interface as defined  
> in the Window Object 1.0specification."
> Which means that the defaultView instance has to be a Window object (as  
> opposed to be another implementation of AbstractView that does not  
> implement the Window interface). Yes, the Window interface is defined to  
> extend AbstractView, but that is not enough to specify that the  
> defaultView property be a Window implementation.

I see. The Window Object 1.0 specification already mandates that though  
(section 2.2 in the current draft). So it seems unnecessary.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Friday, 2 February 2007 14:38:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:02:22 UTC