- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 19:57:25 +0200
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: Kevin E Kelly <kekelly@us.ibm.com>, public-cdf@w3.org
On Thursday, May 4, 2006, 7:45:37 PM, Bjoern wrote: BH> * Kevin E Kelly wrote: >>[...] BH> I did not see a response from the Working Group to my earlier message BH> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/2006Mar/0047 BH> and it is still unclear to me whether BH> * the Working Group formally addressed all comments before publishing BH> the four last call announcements I wonder if you could point to to the specific place in the Process document that requires a Working Group to respond to all comments on a previous Last Call, as opposed to saying that there have been many changes as a result of comments and starting a new Last call? This is particularly important in the case where a specification has been refactored into multiple specifications, or otherwise been subject to major changes in structure. Just to be sure that we have the same set of assumptions here. BH> * where I can read up on why the Working Group has not been able to BH> meet W3C's requirements for regular publication of updated drafts I invite you to look at the volume of comments submitted,many by yourself, and reflect for a moment that responding to each one takes more or less time; thus the time between drafts is O(n) where n is the number of comments. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Interaction Domain Leader Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Thursday, 4 May 2006 17:57:38 UTC