W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-cdf@w3.org > March 2006

Re: CDR: does disabled access lead to null or an exception?

From: Kevin E Kelly <kekelly@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 08:43:44 -0500
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, public-cdf@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFC4FC7069.7EDA376A-ON8525712B.004B011C-8525712B.004B2410@us.ibm.com>

Please find the responses below marked with [KEK],   Your comment was 
accepted and implemented.

Please let us know, within 2 weeks, if this change does not address your 

On behalf of the CDF WG 

Action 348: Respond to comments 7+8 
Message 7 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/2006Jan/0008.html

Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> 
Sent by: public-cdf-request@w3.org
01/02/2006 04:40 AM


CDR: does disabled access lead to null or an exception?

Section 2.1.2., ReferencedDocument:

"If access to the parent document is disabled or there is no parent 
document the attribute must be null."

- Language above says that if access to the parent document is 
disabled for reasons of security, then an exception is thrown. This 
sentence appears to say that instead null will be returned. Please 
resolve the contradiction (ideally by removing the exception).

- Can access to the parent document be disabled for reasons other 
than security? This section should make that clear.

These same comments apply to similar language in Section 2.1.3 about 

[KEK] Paragraphs 2.1.2 and 2.1.3 have been removed.

Received on Wednesday, 8 March 2006 13:40:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:02:21 UTC