Conformance criteria, section 5.1 Entry #1 says "The document MUST be valid RDF serialized in XML". The introduction says that XML (ie, RDF/XML) is only one of the possible serializations. I presume this entry should simply say "The document MUST be valid RDF in some serialization format". Also, Entry #2 seems to be a pretty meaningless requirement in the sense that any serialization of RDF that is valid also means conformance to a valid syntax to namespaces. That is _not_ a CC/PP requirement but simply a valid RDF serialization requirement. The same holds for Entry #5: it refers to the way a valid serialization handles URI-s. Nothing special to CC/PP Ivan -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:39 GMT