Section 3. CC/PP Structure, 3.1. Components, 1st paragraph says "For compatibility with UAProf, the namespace used to qualify component MAY be a UAProf namespace." I do not understand this statement. Does it mean that you may have _two_ different "component" resources that one can use, one not defined by the current document? This strikes me as wrong; they are the different resources in RDF terms. Maybe an extra statement should be put into ccpp-schema that binds these two instead (eg, an rdfs:subclassOf in one direction or, if you accept to use OWL statements, an owl:sameAs or something like that...) Note that this entry appears in the conformance criteria, section 5.1, item #9 -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:39 GMT