W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ccpp2-comments@w3.org > August 2007

Re: [Fwd: LC-1776: CC/PP 2.0 : use of SEQ and BAG]

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:46:55 +0200
Message-ID: <46CEE14F.3080403@w3.org>
To: stephane boyera <boyera@w3.org>
CC: public-ccpp2-comments@w3.org
I am sorry, indeed I forgot, though I intended to.

I accept the WG's response.

Ivan

stephane boyera wrote:
> Dear Ivan,
> 
> as far as i know, you didn't answer to this mail.
> please let us know if you agree with the WG decision.
> 
> Best Regards
> Stephane
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: LC-1776: CC/PP 2.0 : use of SEQ and BAG
> Resent-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 08:50:28 +0000
> Resent-From: public-ccpp2-comments@w3.org
> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 10:50:12 +0200
> From: stephane boyera <boyera@w3.org>
> Organization: W3C
> To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, public-ccpp2-comments@w3.org
> 
> 
> Dear Ivan,
> 
> Thank you for your comment on CC/PP: Structure and vocabularies 2.0 ([1])
> Your comment on the "use of SEQ and BAG" ([2]) has been referenced as
> LC-1776. Please use this reference for further discussion on this
> mailing-list.
> 
> The WG understands that from a purely RDF perspective, the usage of
> multivalued properties and lists would be more appropriate. While one of
> the major rationale behind the development of the CC/PP 2.0
> specification is to integrate the latest version of RDF, it is not its
> only goal. In order to ensure a coherent framework and full
> compatibilities with OMA UAProf 2.0 specification ([4]), it is essential
> to have both spec. based on the same RDF version. So, given that BAG and
> SEQ are not currently deprecated, the WG is proposing to keep their
> usage in this version of the specification in order to restore the
> compatibility between CC/PP 2.0 and UAProf 2.0. Then, due to ongoing
> enhanced cooperation between OMA and W3C particularly in the Mobile Web
> Initiative, we can imagine that both spec in the future could evolve
> together to take into account the latest development of RDF.
> 
> As a result, the WG rejects this comment.
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> On behalf of the UWA WG,
> Stephane Boyera
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-CCPP-struct-vocab2-20070430/
> [2]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ccpp2-comments/2007Jun/0005.html
> [3] http://www.w3.org/2007/uwa/editors-drafts/ccpp2/
> [4]
> http://www.openmobilealliance.org/release_program/docs/UAProf/V2_0-20060206-A/OMA-TS-UAProf-V2_0-20060206-A.pdf
> 
> 

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf


Received on Friday, 24 August 2007 13:46:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:39 GMT