W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ccpp2-comments@w3.org > August 2007

LC-1771: CC/PP 2.0 : Editorial comment on section 3.1

From: stephane boyera <boyera@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:08:49 +0200
Message-ID: <46C565A1.9090808@w3.org>
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, public-ccpp2-comments@w3.org

Dear Ivan,

Thank you for your comment on CC/PP: Structure and vocabularies 2.0 ([1])
Your editorial comment on "section 3.1" ([2]) has been referenced as 
LC-1771. Please use this reference for further discussion on this 
mailing-list.

The UWA WG has decided to reject this comment.
This text is in the first version of the specification verbatim. The 
point is that it is not necessary for components to specify a component 
type. If they do, life is good. If they don't then the CC/PP
processor must not fail. This is needed to allow some UAProf profiles to 
be valid CC/PP. The WG takes the point, but it wasn't
spelled out in the recommendation. We do say explicitly in that section 
that components MAY have type information. The text in question just 
spells out what a processor must do if such information is not available.

Please let us know if you agree with this decision
Best Regards,

On behalf of the UWA WG,
Stephane Boyera
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-CCPP-struct-vocab2-20070430/
[2] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ccpp2-comments/2007Jun/0000.html
[3] http://www.w3.org/2007/uwa/editors-drafts/ccpp2/

-- 
Stephane Boyera		stephane@w3.org
W3C				+33 (0) 4 92 38 78 34
BP 93				fax: +33 (0) 4 92 38 78 22
F-06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex,		
France
Received on Friday, 17 August 2007 09:09:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:39 GMT