W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-canvas-api@w3.org > October to December 2014

Canvas Task Force Meeting - 2014/12/19

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:13:39 -0500
Message-ID: <548B4C73.9040305@intertwingly.net>
To: "public-canvas-api@w3.org" <public-canvas-api@w3.org>
I had the link wrong, the passcode didn't work, and we didn't have 
quorum; so this meeting has been rescheduled.

A corrected link for next week:

http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20141219T20

We also have an update, bug 27264 has been fixed.  I'd appreciate it if 
everybody verified this fix and speak up if there is anything else that 
needs to be done before we return to LC (old process) or CR (new process).

- Sam Ruby

On 12/10/2014 11:29 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> Friday 19:00-21:00 UTC (3:00pm-4:00pm Boston local)
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20141212T19
> Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 226827 ("CANVAS")
> IRC: #canvas-api on irc.w3.org port 6665 or port 80
>
> Topics:
>
> 1) https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27264
> If we get this bug fixed, we can return to LC or CR?
>
> 2) https://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/Canvas_Task_Force/CR-Test
> Still a lot of "fill in" cells, as well as partial passes.
>
> 3)
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-canvas-api/2014OctDec/0044.html
> Consensus is to keep with the 2005 process for this document?
>
> - Sam Ruby
>
Received on Friday, 12 December 2014 20:14:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:31:57 UTC