W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-canvas-api@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: What I think we need

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 17:42:53 -0400
Message-ID: <540E22DD.4070904@intertwingly.net>
To: public-canvas-api@w3.org


On 09/08/2014 05:34 PM, Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote:
> Are we all on for tonight? What irc channel? what is the call-in passcode?

Yes.  See: 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-canvas-api/2014JulSep/0024.html

In one of the topics on the agenda, I'd like to revisit the irc channel 
and time of day of the meeting

- Sam Ruby

> Rich Schwerdtfeger
>
> Inactive hide details for Jay Munro ---09/05/2014 11:17:47 AM---Yes,
> thank you! From: Mark Sadecki [mailto:mark.sadecki@gmail.cJay Munro
> ---09/05/2014 11:17:47 AM---Yes, thank you! From: Mark Sadecki
> [mailto:mark.sadecki@gmail.com]
>
> From: Jay Munro <jaymunro@microsoft.com>
> To: Mark Sadecki <mark.sadecki@gmail.com>
> Cc: "public-canvas-api@w3.org" <public-canvas-api@w3.org>, "Rik Cabanier
> (cabanier@adobe.com)" <cabanier@adobe.com>, Richard
> Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
> Date: 09/05/2014 11:17 AM
> Subject: RE: What I think we need
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Yes, thank you!
>
> *From:* Mark Sadecki [mailto:mark.sadecki@gmail.com] *
> Sent:* Thursday, September 4, 2014 6:05 PM*
> To:* Jay Munro*
> Cc:* public-canvas-api@w3.org; Rik Cabanier (cabanier@adobe.com);
> Richard Schwerdtfeger*
> Subject:* Re: What I think we need
>
> Thanks for putting this together, Jay.  This should help facilitate a
> productive meeting on Monday.   Looking forward to talking more about
> his then.  A few comments:
>
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Jay Munro <_jaymunro@microsoft.com_
> <mailto:jaymunro@microsoft.com>> wrote:
>
>     Here's where I see things with the testing, gleaned from our
>     discussions previously.
>
>     What am I missing?
>
>     1. There are some tests for drawFocusIfNeeded in the canvas
>     collection. According to Philippe, they seem to be up-to-date. Are
>     they enough?
>     2. Mark wrote some tests for Hit Regions, but mentioned that he
>     needed to update them. Those aren't in the collection. We need
>     hitRegions, clearHitRegions, addHitRegion, and removeHitRegion.
>     2. Rich posted a link to the test harness they use for WAI-ARIA -
>     _http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/testharness/_ and Michael Cooper added
>     that it has public read access, but write access is restricted to
>     members of the PFWG (I'm not sure what PF is). Can this harness be
>     used to test?
>
> I think we can use web-platform-tests, which supports manual tests (just
> append -manual to the end of the file name). The test runner will pause
> and ask for confirmation of pass/fail from tester.  Better than using a
> different test suite only because the results will be consolidated in a
> single report.  One concern is that we won't be able to indicate what
> Inspector and/or AAPI we used to perform the test.
>
>     3. Rich gave a set of details for testing the features:
>             - Covering multiple hit regions
>             - Covering fallback content that uses a standard basic HTML5
>     control (I would choose a button), a link, and an aria enabled
>     button or control. We then validate the regions map to the bounds
>     on the accessibility API
>             - Make we can see the bounds drawn as we move focus using
>     the drawFocusIfNeeded function to render the visible focus.
>             - Make sure a magnifier can follow the keyboard focus
>     location on the screen
>             - Test it with a screen reader
>             - Test it with an inspection tool.
>             - test to make sure the id of the object in the hit matches
>     the element you are hovering over.
>             - Move the browser window or scroll the window to make sure
>     that the new location on the screen reflects the new bounds location.
>
>     4. We'll need to figure out:
>             a. Who can write or update the tests. Sounds like Rich and
>     Mark have this pretty much under control.
>
> Maybe.  May need input from others.
>
>              b. Someone to run the tests (more than one). Determine if
>     the drawFocusIfNeeded tests are current, and run any others. It's
>     still open to whether these tests can be automated.
>
> I can help run tests.
>
>              c. Define where the results get reported.
>
> We should try to use web-platform-tests and wptrunner, what is used for
> the rest of canvas.  If that doesn't work, we can look at the PF
> (Protocols and Formats) test harness which is optimized for manual/AAPI
> testing.
> Mark
>
>              d. A summary.
>
>
>
>     Jay Munro  Content Developer 2 Internet Explorer     85/2275
>     _425-703-2242_ <tel:425-703-2242>
>
>
Received on Monday, 8 September 2014 21:43:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:31:57 UTC