Re: Canvas 1.0 from Rik Cabanier on 2014-02-26 (public-canvas-api@w3.org from January to March 2014)

From: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:06:17 -0800
To: Dominic Mazzoni <dmazzoni@google.com>
Cc: Mark Sadecki <mark@w3.org>, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, Jatinder Mann <jmann@microsoft.com>, Canvas <public-canvas-api@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAGN7qDAkgwqEAFuTMgxsCgBBEqzXLDH9Tqp8qc4M=cCn12aUfw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Dominic Mazzoni <dmazzoni@google.com>wrote:

> On a separate note, I'm still uncomfortable with the fact that
> addHitRegion was written, discussed, and developed on the whatwg list, but
> this group has essentially forked it.
>

How was it forked?
The only change to hit regions was to allow any element for fallback
content. This went through the proper channels at the HTML WG and everyone
(including you) argued for it.

> Is there any reason why people participating in this discussion couldn't
> take change proposals to whatwg?
>

Received on Wednesday, 26 February 2014 22:06:45 UTC