W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-canvas-api@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: News from TPac

From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 11:01:59 +0100
Message-ID: <52A1A097.2010800@w3.org>
To: Edward O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com>, public-canvas-api@w3.org
Hi all,

On 06/12/2013 01:09 , Edward O'Connor wrote:
> I don't understand why L2 is necessarily a big spec that will take a
> long time. Why not envision an L2 which is exactly the same as the
> "extension (mini) spec" you have in mind? Features that are unrelated
> can wait until L3. The labels we give these specs don't mean anything,
> don't require us to spend more or less time on them, and don't imply
> anything about taking a few months v. a few years to work on them.

What Ted said. There is nothing that says that shipping has to be a 
heavy process. We can ship iterations of Recommendations (or CRs, or 
whatever) with just the sort of small delta you mention. Nothing wrong 
with having multiple releases a year if they work.

-- 
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Friday, 6 December 2013 10:02:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:31:55 UTC