Yes, it achieves the same result (providing an accessibility object tree),
by default, without having to need the attribute.
Rich Schwerdtfeger
CTO Accessibility Software Group
From: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
To: paniz alipour <alipourpaniz@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, Charles Pritchard
<chuck@jumis.com>, Canvas <public-canvas-api@w3.org>,
public-canvas-api-request@w3.org, Cynthia Shelly
<cyns@microsoft.com>, Steve Faulkner
<faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, david.bolter@gmail.com
Date: 08/07/2011 06:19 AM
Subject: Re: approches of canvas accessibility
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 6:34 AM, paniz alipour <alipourpaniz@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I want to know about adom
> attribute:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-canvas-api/2010JanMar/0185.html
> that you were researching about it ,finally what has happened to it?
The proposal was rejected in favour of always using including the
content of the <canvas> element in the accessibility tree.
--
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
