- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:29:09 -0500
- To: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
- Cc: 'Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis' <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>, 'William Loughborough' <wloughborough@gmail.com>, 'David Singer' <singer@apple.com>, 'Steven Faulkner' <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, 'Maciej Stachowiak' <mjs@apple.com>, 'Sam Ruby' <rubys@intertwingly.net>, 'Ian Hickson' <ian@hixie.ch>, public-html@w3.org, 'W3C WAI-XTECH' <wai-xtech@w3.org>, public-canvas-api@w3.org
This is clearly not about the path to last call. Please take care with subject lines. When you change the gist of a thread, change the subject line. On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 13:36 -0700, John Foliot wrote: > Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote: > > > > which of the following should the web specification designers > > do and why: > > > > (a) Pick a random option. > > (b) Pick the option that involves extra author action. > > (c) Pick the option that involves no extra author action. > > > > It seems Steven is effectively saying they should pick the option that > > involves no extra action, because he accepts the prediction that this > > will lead to more content being accessible. > > Most would agree - if both options produced equal results. [...] -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 24 August 2009 22:29:42 UTC