- From: Andreas Tolfsen <ato@mozilla.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 20:16:55 +0000
- To: public-browser-tools-testing <public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org>
- Cc: Simon Stewart <simon.m.stewart@gmail.com>
Simon Stewart <simon.m.stewart@gmail.com> writes: > Since the definition of "Get Element Text" is basically "run the same > JS that selenium webdriver does", is it safe to assume we can take > the existing tests for this area from Selenium and simply port them > to the web-platform-tests? Or is there some subtlety I'm not aware > of. I think this makes sense, but we should ensure duplicates are eliminated and each tests’ dependencies are limited so that they are more self-contained than they already are. So I think ‘porting the tests’ over from Selenium to WPT is more accurate than it being a simple act of just ‘copy them in’. Speaking as someone who has previously written another Selenium driver implementation in large based on the Selenium tests, I’d subjectively say that the functional Java test suite probably has the highest coverage for element text. There are also a number of unittests for the Selenium atom that makes out the guts of the element text JS blob. Is there complete overlap between these and the functional tests, or do some of the unittest also need to be ported?
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2017 20:25:45 UTC