- From: John Jansen <John.Jansen@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 18:47:40 +0000
- To: "David Burns (dburns@mozilla.com)" <dburns@mozilla.com>, "public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org" <public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org>
> Currently all the major parts of the specification have been done*. However, > we have diverged the specification on some parts. Some of that was intended > and some of that was not intended and we need to fix these things up. The > more people, who are looking at this from either a local end implementation > or remote end implementation, who can report issues the better. I was looking at Section 13.1[1] and would love it if the algorithm were modified to match the bug you and Jim were discussing a couple years ago[2]. > Test Suite: > This month, Mozilla will hopefully start the work to supply the necessary parts > to Web-Platform-Tests and start work on auditing the test suite that is there. > This is being driven both by Gecko engineers and Servo engineers who would > like this supported. At Microsoft we have been doing this at a high level (very high level so far). Would love to do this work together. You may remember the tool I showed briefly at TPAC that helps map tests to sections of the spec based on the Web Annotations[3] spec. Maybe if you guys take the time to vet the tests themselves and we take the time to match sections to those tests we can get it done more quickly. > Charter: > Our current extension to the charter ends at the end of March. I would like to > get this extended so we can do the "to recommendation" process, which > requires work, mentioned above in this email, to have been done. Happy to help here as well. I don't think we will be allowed to publish a new draft at the w3c if we are not under Charter, but Mike can correct me if I'm wrong. -John [1] https://w3c.github.io/webdriver/webdriver-spec.html#element-click [2] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21184 [3] https://www.w3.org/annotation/
Received on Thursday, 3 March 2016 18:48:10 UTC