W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > October 2010

[minutes] BPWG Call 2010-10-19

From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 16:36:58 +0200
Message-ID: <4CBDAD0A.2010909@w3.org>
To: BPWG Public <public-bpwg@w3.org>
Hi,

The minutes of today's meeting are available at:
  http://www.w3.org/2010/10/19-bpwg-minutes.html

... and copied as raw text below.

Resolved during this call:
- 2-month charter extension requested  to assist MWABP to Rec.
- Publication of latest draft of Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Proxies as a WG Note requested.
- No further calls during MWABP PR review period. Calls will be scheduled as needed based on the reviews received.
- A few special thanks to people involved in the life of the WG:
  * Dan and Jo for Great steering and stewardship
  * Dom and myself as staff contacts
  * Tom and Eduardo for their consistent contributions to the WG as invited experts.

Not sure what Shakespeare would say, but as Europe would say, "it's the final countdown".

Thanks,
Francois.


-----
19 Oct 2010

    [2]Agenda

       [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2010Oct/0004.html

    See also: [3]IRC log

       [3] http://www.w3.org/2010/10/19-bpwg-irc

Attendees

    Present
           jeffs (+ observer), adam, jo, francois, EdC, Kai_Dietrich,
           SeanP

    Regrets
    Chair
           Jo

    Scribe
           francois

Contents

      * [4]Topics
          1. [5]Observer
          2. [6]Charter extension
          3. [7]Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Proxies
          4. [8]AOB
          5. [9]Informal gathering
      * [10]Summary of Action Items
      _________________________________________________________

Observer

    <jeffs> one of our graduate students (Yerbol Yembergenov) is getting
    ready to start up with the SVG WG, and if no one minds he will be
    observing today's BPWG WG meeting

    jo: Jeff has an observer. Any objection to that?

    [none heard]

Charter extension

    jo: Good news is that transition of MWABP to Proposed Recommendation
    has been approved.
    ... Congratulations to the group and the editor, Adam!

    francois: The Proposed Recommendation phase is targeted towards W3C
    Membership. During the PR review period (4 weeks minimum), AC reps
    from members companies are requested to fill out a questionnaire to
    show support or to request changes in the document. At the end of
    the review period, the group may have to respond to the comments
    that may have been received. Nothing to be done during the review
    period except remind your AC reps to fill out the questionnaire and
    support the specification as-is.

    jo: in short, Adam, you may not entirely be done, beware!
    ... One thing is sure, the PR review period will go after our
    charter end date (end of this month).
    ... What I propose is that we request extension to the end of the
    year.

    francois: No need to meet, no need to have calls indeed during the
    PR review period.

    <jo> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: The BPWG requests extension of its charter
    to

    <jo> 2010-12-31 solely in order to allow Mobile Web Application Best
    Practices

    <jo> to complete its transition to Rec. The WG does not intend to
    meet other than to review any pR comments and resolve them.

    francois: We'll precise that charter extension is solely to assist
    MWABP to rec

    <EdC> +1

    <jeffs> +1

    <Kai> +1

    <SeanP> +1

    <adam> +1

    +1

    RESOLUTION: The BPWG requests extension of its charter to 2010-12-31
    solely in order to allow Mobile Web Application Best Practices to
    complete its transition to Rec. The WG does not intend to meet other
    than to review any PR comments and resolve them.

    <jeffs> +1

    jo: Great! (Copyright ©2010, DKA)

Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Proxies

    jo: We are to publish the guidelines as a WG Note.

    <jeffs> +1 for CT Guidelines for publication as a WG Note

    jo: francois and I have prepared the updated draft. Only nits in the
    Status of this document section.

    -> [11]Latest draft of CT guidelines

      [11] http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/Guidelines/NOTE-ct-guidelines-20101026/

    Most important changes:

    [[ The Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group eventually resolved
    to discontinue the work on this document and to publish it as a
    Working Group Note. The Working Group hopes that this Note may serve
    as a basis for discussion and negotiation among players.

    Other than changes to this section, the document has not changed
    since its publication as a W3C Candidate Recommendation. In
    particular, the use of normative language has been kept as-is. ]]

    <jo> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: The BPWG requests publication of the CT
    Guidelines dated 18 October 2010 as a WG Note

    <EdC> +1

    <jeffs> +1

    <SeanP> +1

    <Kai> +1 works for me as written

    jo: If everyone agrees here, I suggest we simply resolve to publish
    that draft as a WG Note.

    +1

    <adam> +1

    RESOLUTION: The BPWG requests publication of the CT Guidelines dated
    18 October 2010 as a WG Note

    jo: So CT Guidelines done.
    ... Anything else on that topic?

    [none heard]

AOB

    jo: As mentioned on the agenda, we are basically done.
    ... waiting for comments on the MWABP PR
    ... I suggest that we don't meet in the meantime.

    <Kai> Informal gathering?

    <jo> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: The WG will not meet again unless there
    are comments arising from the PR period on MWABP

    <Kai> +1

    +1

    <jeffs> +1

    <adam> +1

    <SeanP> +1

    RESOLUTION: The WG will not meet again unless there are comments
    arising from the PR period on MWABP

    jo: My heart is filled with sorrow for having to put an end to this,
    as well as joy!

    <jo> ACTION-1035?

    <trackbot> ACTION-1035 -- Daniel Appelquist to create a plan to
    raise awareness on mobileOK through some campaign -- due 2009-12-18
    -- OPEN

    <trackbot>
    [12]http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/1035

      [12] http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/1035

    <jo> ACTION-1073?

    <trackbot> ACTION-1073 -- Jo Rabin to talk with Francois about what
    is needed to enact the above resolution on CT Guidelines -- due
    2010-10-05 -- OPEN

    <trackbot>
    [13]http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/1073

      [13] http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/1073

    jo: Looking at remaining actions. Dan requested that we left
    action-1035 open, probably as a memorial of some kind.
    ... next action is done.

    close ACTION-1073

    <trackbot> ACTION-1073 Talk with Francois about what is needed to
    enact the above resolution on CT Guidelines closed

    Jo: Jumping to actions that are pending reviews

    ACTION-1072?

    <trackbot> ACTION-1072 -- François Daoust to prepare distribution of
    comments for BP2. -- due 2010-10-05 -- PENDINGREVIEW

    <trackbot>
    [14]http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/1072

      [14] http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/1072

    close ACTION-1072

    <trackbot> ACTION-1072 Prepare distribution of comments for BP2.
    closed

    ACTION-1074?

    <trackbot> ACTION-1074 -- François Daoust to send transition request
    to PR for MWABP -- due 2010-10-05 -- PENDINGREVIEW

    <trackbot>
    [15]http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/1074

      [15] http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/1074

    close ACTION-1074

    <trackbot> ACTION-1074 Send transition request to PR for MWABP
    closed

    jo: And that, my dears, should be it.
    ... No open issues.
    ... Looking back at actions.

    ACTION-1?

    <trackbot> ACTION-1 -- Dean Jackson to test action - ignore -- due
    2005-07-17 -- CLOSED

    <trackbot> [16]http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/1

      [16] http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/1

    jo: First action was on 17 July 2005, and we went all the way to
    action 1074. Great!
    ... Are there any business of any sort you'd like to discuss?

Informal gathering

    jo: Kai, you're the party guy, what do you suggest? :)

    kai: nothing in particular, did you have anything in mind?

    jo: not really, it's not in our power to request another meeting,
    unfortunately.
    ... let's leave that as an open thought
    ... I'd like to add some personal thanks on record.

    <jeffs> +1 to applause for W3C team members Dom and Francois

    <adam> +1

    jo: First of all, I'd like to thank Dom and Francois for their
    fantastic support from W3C side.

    <EdC> +1

    <Kai> +1, well done and thank you so much!

    [fd: merci!]

    <jo> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: WG would like to thank FD and preceding
    Team Reps, especially Dom for their unparalleled support

    <EdC> +1

    <jeffs> +1

    <Kai> +1

    RESOLUTION: WG would like to thank FD and preceding Team Reps,
    especially Dom for their unparalleled support

    jo: Secondly, I'd like to thank Eduardo and Tom Hume to have
    contributed as Invited Experts. Eduardo, I'd really like to thank
    you for the quality of your consistent technical comments

    <jo> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: WG expresses its sincere thanks to EdC and
    Tom for their contributions to the WG

    <SeanP> +1

    <adam> +1

    <jeffs> +1

    <Kai> +1

    +1

    RESOLUTION: WG expresses its sincere thanks to EdC and Tom for their
    contributions to the WG as Invited Experts

    jo: With that, I'd like to thank my colleague Dan Appelquist, and I
    think we're done!

    Kai: well, not quite. We'd like to thank you as well!

    <jeffs> many thanks to Jo and Dan for their great work keeping the
    meetings productive and on-track without losing their great senses
    of humor

    <jo> [thanks!]

    <jo> EdC yes!

    PROPOSED RESOLUTION: WG expresses its sincere thanks to Dan and Jo
    to have lead the boat from start to end!

    <Kai> +1

    <EdC> +1

    <jeffs> +1

    <adam> +1

    +1

    <Kai> you won't get off that easily :-)

    <SeanP> +1

    RESOLUTION: WG expresses its sincere thanks to Dan and Jo to have
    lead the boat from start to end!

    jo: No further calls from the time being.

    [call adjourned]

Summary of Action Items

    [End of minutes]
Received on Tuesday, 19 October 2010 14:37:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 October 2010 14:37:36 GMT