- From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:18:49 +0100
- To: Adam Connors <adamconnors@google.com>
- CC: Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group WG <public-bpwg@w3.org>
Thanks. Good idea. I updated the document with "Implemented" (a refresh may be needed). Adam Connors wrote: > Looks good to me Francois. > > Could we use "Implemented" instead of "Pass" in the table? The opposite > of "pass" is "fail" which doesn't really apply since we are saying we > don't expect people to implement all BPs in a single app. > > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org > <mailto:fd@w3.org>> wrote: > > Hi, > > Per ACTION-1037, I was to update the implementation report template > for the upcoming Candidate Recommendation of the Mobile Web > Application Best Practices specification to explain that we are not > looking for "all or nothing" implementation reports. > > The result is available at: > http://www.w3.org/2010/01/mwabp-implementation-report-template > > I also updated the (currently empty) implementation report in the > same vein: > http://www.w3.org/2010/01/mwabp-implementation-report > > Links to these documents will appear in the Status of This Document > section of the upcoming spec. Let me know if you think something > needs to be changed. > > Francois. > >
Received on Thursday, 11 February 2010 10:19:18 UTC