W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > September 2009

Re: In place edit of CT Guidelines 1u

From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:09:44 +0200
Message-ID: <4ABB2948.4070907@w3.org>
To: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
CC: Public BPWG <public-bpwg@w3.org>
I had seen the change, it just did not occur to me that this meant I'd 
have to re-generate a new version of the ICS...

Anyway. The new ICS doc is available at:
http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/Guidelines/ics-090923

I re-updated (in-place) the link to the ICS but now realize you are to 
generate a new version of the spec anyway.
OK, time for coffee, it seems.

Francois.



Jo Rabin wrote:
> Hey Francois
> 
> What I forgot to mention was that a "should" has changed to a "must" in 
> the last revision so the conformance statement needs to be regenerated.
> 
> What I also forgot to do as a result of what can only be described as 
> "extreme editorial sloppiness"  is update section 3.4 in the spirit that 
> you have already mentioned, namely that the the first "must" in the 
> second paragraph should be emboldened, and the remaining RFC 2119 words 
> in that para should be in quotes (as they are references to rather than 
> uses of the terms).
> 
> So if you would be so kind as to create a new ICS I will link to it and 
> do the update and create a brand new version 1v to celebrate.
> 
> I think we are on the "long tail" of changes here.
> 
> Jo
> 
> On 24/09/2009 08:17, Francois Daoust wrote:
>> Hi Jo,
>>
>> I took the liberty to do an in-place edit of the document as well to 
>> update the link to the ICS statement (which will anyway need to be 
>> updated when we publish the document for real as the editorial note 
>> suggests).
>>
>> Francois.
>>
>>
>> Jo Rabin wrote:
>>> Many thanks to Eduardo for his note about H.1.2 [2]. I have done an 
>>> in-place edit of the document (which therefore remains at [1] below).
>>>
>>> Jo
>>>
>>> Festina Lente. Edit in Haste, Repent at Leisure.
>>>
>>> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2009Sep/0090.html
>>>
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> Subject: CT Guidelines Version 1u
>>> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:40:30 +0100
>>> From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
>>> To: Public BPWG <public-bpwg@w3.org>
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I have enacted the resolutions taken on yesterday's call in the newly
>>> released version of this document [1]. ACTION-1011, ACTION-1012,
>>> ACTION-1013, ACTION-1014 refer.
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/Guidelines/090923 
>>>
>>>
>>> A reminder that we plan to take a resolution on next week's call to
>>> request elevation to Last Call unless there are any show-stoppers in
>>> between.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Jo
>>>
>>>
>>>
> 
Received on Thursday, 24 September 2009 08:10:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:43:01 UTC