W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > May 2009

Re: MWABP for discussion: JSON parsing vs eval benchmarking.

From: Jeff Sonstein <jeffs@it.rit.edu>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 06:20:23 -0400
Cc: Rotan Hanrahan <rotan.hanrahan@mobileaware.com>, public-bpwg@w3.org
Message-Id: <0C00E7CA-8818-4EA3-B650-8D36474D1366@it.rit.edu>
To: Adam Connors <adamconnors@google.com>
On May 20, 2009, at 5:25 AM, Adam Connors wrote:

> so our options are:
>
> a) return to a more nuanced wording (The regexp supplied is very  
> useful, thanks Rotan).
>
> b) remain silent on the whole issue.
>
> c) leave the BP as is.
>
> I guess I favour (a), and will lean in the direction of favouring  
> parsing in the light of the sentiment on this thread...

I agree

FWIW
there is a decent discussion here:

   http://www.json.org/js.html

and example code here:

   http://www.json.org/json_parse.js

jeffs

--
"Listen, nobody likes beheadings..."
- G.W. Bush -
============

Prof. Jeff Sonstein

http://www.it.rit.edu/~jxs/
http://ariadne.iz.net/~jeffs/
http://chw.rit.edu/blog/
http://ariadne.iz.net/~jeffs/jeffs.asc
http://www.it.rit.edu/~jxs/emailDisclaimer.html
Received on Wednesday, 20 May 2009 10:21:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:43:00 UTC