- From: Jeff Sonstein <jeffs@it.rit.edu>
- Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 06:20:23 -0400
- To: Adam Connors <adamconnors@google.com>
- Cc: Rotan Hanrahan <rotan.hanrahan@mobileaware.com>, public-bpwg@w3.org
On May 20, 2009, at 5:25 AM, Adam Connors wrote: > so our options are: > > a) return to a more nuanced wording (The regexp supplied is very > useful, thanks Rotan). > > b) remain silent on the whole issue. > > c) leave the BP as is. > > I guess I favour (a), and will lean in the direction of favouring > parsing in the light of the sentiment on this thread... I agree FWIW there is a decent discussion here: http://www.json.org/js.html and example code here: http://www.json.org/json_parse.js jeffs -- "Listen, nobody likes beheadings..." - G.W. Bush - ============ Prof. Jeff Sonstein http://www.it.rit.edu/~jxs/ http://ariadne.iz.net/~jeffs/ http://chw.rit.edu/blog/ http://ariadne.iz.net/~jeffs/jeffs.asc http://www.it.rit.edu/~jxs/emailDisclaimer.html
Received on Wednesday, 20 May 2009 10:21:27 UTC