W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > March 2009

Re: Comments on Addendum to Mobile Web Best Practices

From: Alan Chuter <achuter@technosite.es>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 16:37:16 +0100
Message-ID: <49AFF1AC.9040700@technosite.es>
To: Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group WG <public-bpwg@w3.org>
Francois Daoust wrote:
> 3.9 Clarity
> -----
> Add a reference to a definition of the Fogg test?
I don't think that it applies in the same way to languages other than 
English. Or at best, each language has it's own algorithms. In other 
languages they are not much known or used (in Spanish for example). 
there's a summary of the subject by Gez Lemon [1]. I'm sure we've been 
through this before, but I can't find anything in the archives.

WCAG 2.0 has "3.1.5 Reading Level" but it is level AAA, I think because 
it is not testable. The "understanding" page [2] is worth a look, if 
only to see how long-winded and complicated it is.




[1] http://juicystudio.com/services/readability.php
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/meaning-supplements.html


-- 
Alan Chuter
Departamento de Usabilidad y Accesibilidad
Consultor
Technosite - Grupo Fundosa
FundaciĆ³n ONCE
Tfno.: 91 121 03 30
Fax: 91 375 70 51
achuter@technosite.es
http://www.technosite.es
Received on Thursday, 5 March 2009 15:39:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:43:00 UTC